検索結果をRefWorksへエクスポートします。対象は1件です。
Export
RT Book, Whole SR Electronic DC OPAC T1 Alasdair MacIntyre, Rationality and Education : Against Education of Our Age / by Steven A. Stolz T2 SpringerBriefs on Key Thinkers in Education. ISSN:22119388 A1 Stolz, Steven A A1 SpringerLink (Online service) YR 2019 FD 2019 SP XIV, 71 p K1 Education -- Philosophy K1 Critical Thinking K1 Educational sociology K1 Learning, Psychology of K1 Educational Philosophy K1 Philosophy of Education K1 Critical Thinking K1 Sociology of Education K1 Instructional Psychology ED 1st ed. 2019. PB Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer PP Cham SN 9783319922768 LA English (英語) CL LCC:LB1-3640 CL DC23:370.1 NO Despite Alasdair MacIntyre being known as an academic who has made many notable contributions to a range of areas in philosophy, his thinking on education is not as well-known and/or properly understood by most audiences and readerships that predominantly reside in educational contexts. With this in mind, this book aims to provide a critique of MacIntyre’s thinking about education, and hence commences with a central theme found in MacIntyre’s extensive corpus concerning the fragmentation and disunification of ideas found in our culture and society that stems both from the rejection of metaphysics and what it means to be a human being living within the context of history. According to MacIntyre, part of the problem why this has occurred is due to educational institutions, particularly universities failing to resist the pressure exerted from industry and the state to conform. Unfortunately, this has resulted in a type of intellectual dissensus where the shared conceptions of rational enquiry and the role of reason have been replaced by pluralistic notions of private and personal choices concerning the good, and a disillusionment with reason that is ultimately exhibited as apathy and conformism. In order to overcome this apathy and conformism found in our culture and society, MacIntyre’s educational project is concerned with the cultivation of rationality; however, this is not an easy undertaking because it involves students being confronted with alternative – sometimes rather hostile – rival traditions so they both come to see rival points of view and understand that each tradition, including their own, does not come from a neutral or value-neutral standpoint. To MacIntyre, dialectical encounters between traditions is a crucial starting point of a good education, but for intellectual and academic progress to be made, rational enquiry needs to be grounded in a shared understanding of first principles that aims at truth and rational vindication. It is this shift in thinking that is of interest in the latter part of this book, particularly MacIntyre’s views around tradition-orientated communities of practice. Here, MacIntyre is concerned with the praxis of his educational project and the crucial role tradition-orientated communities play in the cultivation of independent reasoners who are capable of seeing the interconnectedness between different forms of knowledge that can lead us to an informed discovery of both the truth, and of the good, but most importantly exhibit virtuous dispositions which are vital to good practical reasoning. NO HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92276-8 NO 書誌ID=EB16356705; LK [E Book]https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92276-8 OL 30